|
|
- Info
5.1 Managing email
How to manage
email | Technical
issues | Policy and
procedural issues | Staff
training issues and strategies | Footnotes | Other
topics
Email is a big asset and a big liability in the NSW public sector.
NSW government organisations receive millions of emails each year, with
the majority of agencies identifying that between 40% and 80% of these
relate to official business.[14]
Consequently large amounts of corporate information and corporate
risk are tied up in your email system. Email therefore needs special
treatment in your organisation and specific requirements and systems
need to be in place to ensure that email can be managed.
Quantifying the email problem
Quantifying the cost of looking for information
Information contained in email messages is notoriously difficult to
find. If 50 people in an organisation waste just 15 minutes each, each
day, looking for information, at an average salary of $60 000, then
that organisation wastes one and a half person years and $93 750 per
annum. [15] Email management strategies can help to control information
and minimise this waste.
Quantifying the risks of not capturing information
75% of NSW government organisations capture between 0% and 40% of
business emails. Extrapolating from these figures, it is estimated
that, in the government sector, 119 million email messages are not
being captured each year.[16] In the university sector it is estimated
that 850 million email messages are not being captured. [17]
This failure to capture information puts organisations at risk and
affects daily business operations. Again, implementing email management
strategies can help to control information and mitigate this risk.
How to
manage email
To effectively manage your corporate email you need to have:
- an appropriate technical solution in place
- clear policy and procedures, and
- ongoing staff training in email management.
The following table outlines a number of strategies to help you
implement these requirements. These strategies can also be applied to
the management of other messaging formats, such as instant messaging or
SMS, which might also be used in your workplace.
Technical
issues
- we need a technical solution to help us with our email
- our staff use their email accounts to manage their email
messages
- we use shared folders in our email system to store and provide
access to messages relating to different projects
- we use the network for email message management
- we use backup tapes to manage our email
- we use an email vault system
| Issue: |
Resolution: |
| We need a technical solution to help us with our email
management problem |
The best and most appropriate technical solution is Information
Asset Management System (IAMS) software.
This solution is scalable, provides a secure and controlled
environment for email management, provides universal and integrated
access to information across your organisation and can be integrated
with a variety of messaging platforms.
Guidance on selecting IAMS software that is appropriate to your
specific business needs is provided in the State Records' Recordkeeping
in Brief 2 - Selecting records
management software.
Technical solutions that are not appropriate for managing email
records include message management:
- within the email system
- within the corporate network
- within email vault /extended storage systems
- on backup tapes.
|
| Our staff use their email accounts to manage their email
messages |
This approach means:
- only the individual can access this valuable corporate information
– important corporate knowledge is virtually inaccessible to other
staff
- messages are not protected, they are simply stored
- message management is at the discretion of the individual.
This approach does not allow the informational value of email to be
leveraged and does not mitigate the risks of email management.
|
| We use shared folders in our email system to store and provide
access to messages relating to different projects |
This strategy at least allows broader access to the project and
other information that is contained in corporate email messages. It is
not, however, an ideal approach. This is because:
- it does not allow access to all different types of records that may
be relevant to the project. Users still need to access other
information sites to gain all the details that they need
- it does not protect or manage the records, it just provides a
storage area for them.
|
| We use the network for email message management |
Again, this approach allows broader access to messages, but it
is not ideal because:
- unless tight controls are put in place, it can be difficult to
ensure that no one can alter emails and other records stored on the
network
- it does not work in all business environments – some email systems
do not allow for the easy storage of emails outside of the email
system.
|
| We use backup tapes to manage our email |
Back up is used for disaster management. Its use for email
management is very problematic. This is because:
- email messages stored in backup systems are not easily accessible.
Searching for specific information in these systems can be very time
consuming, particularly if you have a number of email servers. If
backup tapes are used as a management system, doing a search across all
servers to find necessary information is incredibly time consuming and
expensive.
- backup tapes are generally subject to regular overwriting at
predetermined intervals. Email messages often have long term business
value. Overwriting all messages at a standard point in time without
consideration of the specific business value of different messages is a
significant business risk. Keeping email messages in an IAMS allows
them to be kept for their different legally required retention
periods.
- keeping backup tapes indefinitely to mitigate the risks described
above is itself a significant risk and escalates the search and
discovery costs associated with trying to find information.
- when stored in a backup system emails are not available in their
business context. This minimises their usefulness and means the
information used as the basis for a decision may not be
comprehensive.
|
| We use an email vault system |
These systems allow broad access but:
- generally only the individual can access their email messages in
the vault system meaning that important corporate knowledge is
inaccessible to other staff
- vault systems can result in the retention of all emails, not just
those of ongoing business value
- vault systems keep the system manager locked into the system by
requiring the purchase of ever bigger storage devices to cope with the
ever accumulating volume of emails, because vault systems do not
provide a comprehensive and systematic means of actually managing email
messages. They effectively allow the basic email management problem to
persist, rather than actually solving it
- it can be difficult to ensure that all messages are kept for their
necessary legal retention periods.
|
Policy and procedural
issues
- we don’t have a corporate policy on email
- how do we identify which email messages should be
captured?
- how do we identify who should capture email messages?
- how do we identify when email messages should be
captured?
| Issue: |
Resolution: |
| We don’t have a corporate policy on email |
A corporate email policy is a necessary step in the management of
your email. A corporate email sets out the rules for email management
that everyone in your organisation must follow and helps staff to
identify which messages should and should not be captured.
In your policy you should:
- identify that the email system is a business system and should be
used for the conduct of official business
- specify that records sent and received by a government employee in
the course of official duties are official records under the State
Records Act
- identify that email messages contain vital business information
necessary to support daily business operations and may be required for
legal processes, such as discovery, FOI, subpoenas or needed by
auditors, courts or Royal Commissions
- specify that email messages which have business value must be
captured as official records in your nominated system (preferably an
IAMS)
- specify that remote/home use of corporate email is subject to the
same rules and recordkeeping requirements
- identify which email messages should be captured as records in your
system and who should do the capturing.
|
| How do we identify which email messages should be
captured? |
To decide whether a message should be captured as a business record
you could encourage staff to ask the following questions. If the answer
to any of these questions is yes, then the message should be saved into
your nominated system:
- does the message approve or authorise actions?
- is it a formal communication between staff relating to work?
- does it signify a policy change or development?
- does it commit the organisation to an arrangement or to a business
deal?
- does it contain advice, provide guidance or constitute formal
communications with people inside or outside the organisation?
- am I required to act upon it?
- is it external correspondence I have received relating to
work?
- is it something that I have sent for a business purpose?
- is it something I have used at work to make a decision?
- if I left this job tomorrow, would my successor need the
information in this message to continue with this matter?
- is the matter to which the message relates one which may be
reviewed or audited later?
|
| How do we identify who should capture email messages? |
You don’t want multiple people capturing the same email message.
Rules to identify who should captured email messages could include
simple guidance such as:
- if you sent it, capture it
- if you were the only one who received it from someone outside the
organisation, capture it
- if lots of you received it from someone outside of the
organisation, the main recipient or the person with prime
responsibility for the business documented in the email captures the
message
- if in doubt, check with other recipients about who is capturing the
message.
|
| How do we identify when email messages should be captured? |
You could recommend requirements such as:
- users should capture relevant email messages when they are received
or when the flow of correspondence documented in a series of messages
has ceased
- alternatively, for project based work, you could specify that all
relevant email messages must be captured at a defined point in a
business process. This may be at existing project review points, the
completion of a tender process etc. Be aware though that this approach
may limit information access because the email is not captured
immediately. The risks associated with this approach must be fully
considered.
|
Staff training issues and
strategies
- we need to get staff to recognise that email management is a
significant corporate problem
- we need to get management on board to help us address our email
management issues
- we can’t get staff to actually manage their email
- we are capturing email messages but they are still very difficult
to find
- we need to ensure that deleted messages are actually deleted
- our organisation receives hundreds of email messages each day and
we need to try and minimise the number of messages we are managing
| Issue: |
Resolution: |
| We need to get staff to recognise that email management is a
significant corporate problem |
Email management is a significant issue for all government bodies.
To draw attention to the problem, points to emphasise include:
- email management is a necessary business process, not a separate
records management process. The email management requirements you are
implementing are directly related to organisational efficiencies and
the business bottom line
- email management is not an overhead. Properly managing email means
you can get more work done and actually get better quality work done.
Email management can save money, mitigate risk and increase
efficiency
- try to quantify the problem as it specifically applies in your
organisation. In a 2005 State Records survey, 60% of public sector
bodies reported that they could not easily access relevant emails in
response to discovery orders, subpoenas or FOI requests. Calculate
specifically what responding to discovery or other requirements has
cost your organisation. Or use a calculator like the
Stever Robbins calculator to calculate what poor email
management strategies could be costing your organisation
- based on conservative State Records estimates, across the
government sector more than 119 million business related email messages
each year are not captured into recordkeeping systems by State
government agencies. This is a tremendous risk and one that could have
huge financial costs to your organisation
- Microsoft has calculated that in 2008, the average office worker
will spend more than 15 hours a week reading and sending email while
costing the organisation approximately $28,000 per year analysing and
searching email.[18] Any efficiencies that can be gained by
improving this process will have a direct bearing on the office bottom
line.
|
| We need to get Management on board to help us address our email
management issues |
Quantify the scale of the problem as it applies to your
organisation and identify exactly what you will need to solve it. Don’t
just tell Management that there is a problem that needs fixing.
Identify the problem, flag its actual and potential costs, outline
specifically the steps you will take to rectify the problem and then
identify the complete cost of your proposed solution.
Factors to emphasise are that with standard email management
practices:
- valuable corporate information is locked away in hundreds of
generally inaccessible data silos, and
- valuable corporate information has to rely on the vagaries of
individual practice for survival.
To management, it is important to clearly explain the risks
associated with current email management practices. Good business is
reliant on good risk management. Emphasise too the financial benefits
of what you are doing. You are trying to save your organisation money
by working smarter and by minimising risk.
You need to make it clear that you can’t just throw a technical
solution at this problem. Ongoing training and support is
necessary.
Management may also need to be convinced that email management is
not all overhead. You should emphasise the significant returns on
investment that can be achieved through effective management of your
email systems.
|
| We can’t get staff to actually manage their email |
You can try numerous different strategies to get staff to manage
their email.
- Have a good policy in place that clearly identifies the email
management rules in your workplace.
- Before you develop your email requirements, interview the staff you
want to adhere to email standards. Ask them why they don’t capture
messages in official systems. What are the barriers they see? What do
they prefer about the ad hoc approaches they have developed? What can
you learn from their preferences and approaches? People may be more
prepared to follow procedures and requirements that they feel they have
had a hand in developing.
- Try to automate email capture as much as possible – most of the
IAMS tools on government contract enable an interface between your
email and EDRMS systems and can link email inbox folders with specific
record containers in your IAMS.
- Start by targeting the sections of your organisation where the most
important or high risk transactions take place. Educate these users and
establish firm policies and procedures. By following this method you
will deal with your most high risk sections first and establish good
policies and procedures that have been tested and which can then be
applied elsewhere.
- Get senior management support. Have senior management send out an
email announcing the importance of email management and listing the
schedule of necessary upcoming training courses.
- Invest in training and support. You may think you have no time or
money for training but proactive training is, in the long term, so much
more cost effective than retrospectively fixing problems caused by poor
adherence to your email management rules.
- Have senior managers stress that email management is a necessary
business requirement.
- Identify the specific problems in your organisation that have been
caused by poor email management. Frame your email requirements around
these problems and how they can be rectified.
- Try to make your email management strategy as easy as you can. Try
to make it deviate as little as possible from current work practices
and allow filing in ways that make sense to users. If you have to
create an extra layer of ‘invisible’ translations behind this to
translate business language into recordkeeping language (such as your
business classification scheme), then do this but try to make it
invisible to the users. You want to impose as little extra learning and
requirements on them as possible.
- Try the 5 minute rule. If you can’t explain your email procedures
in 5 minutes, then they are too complicated and not sufficiently
automated.
- Make learning fun and offer incentives – have quizzes on email
management with small prizes, like a free coffee.
- Make email management part of job contracts so that people make an
official record of their willingness to follow email policy.
- Continually revise and redevelop your email requirements until you
get them right.
- Demonstrate that what you are trying to achieve through email
management is support specific business projects, budgets and
timeframes – make what you do about their business, not your business.
It is not about records management, it is about good business.
- Have an email policy launch party – create a buzz and make everyone
aware of what you’re doing. Really emphasise why the changes you are
making are good and necessary – how they contribute to the bottom line
and to individual efficiencies.
- Target managers and issue a punchy, concise summary of what you are
doing and why.
- Keep track of who is and who isn’t capturing email. You don’t have
to target individuals, rather calculate how many people in each
business unit are actually using the systems you’ve put in place. You
should be able to determine approximately how many emails your
organisation receives. On very conservative estimates, 30% of emails
received are official business records. Based on these figures, are all
business units capturing adequate numbers of emails? You may want to
target high risk or key business areas and set a higher benchmark
capture rate for them. If people aren’t achieving the required rates
organise a meeting with the appropriate managers and discuss the
reasons why. You could develop targeted training for specific business
areas, or guidelines developed around their specific work practices.
You could utilise specific workflow technology in their business area
to further automate the capture of messages.
- Some people will immediately see the benefit of what you are trying
to achieve. Use these people, ‘power users’, to help educate other
users.
- Do some benchmarking both before and after you implement your
changes. Can you demonstrate improved efficiencies in information
retrieval? Have you saved money when responding to discovery orders?
What are the daily efficiencies you can report on? Do people feel more
prepared in their daily work – do they have greater amounts of more
relevant information more easily at their fingertips?
- You could automatically delete all emails from inboxes 60 days
after receipt or restrict the size of inboxes so that only a limited
number of messages can be stored there long term. These more radical
measures require that a good, alternative system is in operation to
store email messages and require staff to have the knowledge to use the
alternate system.
- You may find it effective to develop specific local solutions for
individual workgroups. If an organisation-wide strategy is too complex,
roll out tailored, smaller scale solutions at the workgroup or project
level. You could design your own database or deploy small scale records
management software solutions to achieve this. This solution could be
appropriate for large organisations with decentralised structures and
broad business interests. Solutions of this type could be trialled as
prototypes or models for corporate-wide email
strategies. [19]
|
| We are capturing email messages but they are still very difficult
to find |
A recent survey in New Zealand showed that 37% of electronic records
were completely inaccessible due to poor titling or other forms of poor
metadata application. [20]
Adequate titling of email messages is critical to their ability to
serve immediate business needs and long term accountability
purposes.
All staff need to be made aware of the value of attaching clear,
meaningful and unambiguous titles to their messages.
For example, a recipient should be able to receive a message and,
from its title alone, determine what the message is about and the
specific area of business that it relates to. Having titles that meet
these requirements immediately simplifies business processes and
contributes to efficiency.
For example, don’t title a message ‘A few extra points’, or
‘Workplan’. Instead, titles such as ‘Additional comments in response to
Retail section planning meeting, 19/9/08’ or ‘Education Services
workplan, 2007’ make recipients immediately aware of the message
contents. These titles will also have meaning longer term in the
records system and provide adequate search terms to enable users to
successfully search for information.
It is important to emphasise that good, basic email titling will
save your organisation significant amounts of time and money by
simplifying searching. Spending time and money on educating staff about
the importance of email titling will ultimately save you considerable
money.
You could try to:
- make it impossible to send a message in your system if the title
field is blank
- encourage users to retitle messages when the content of a thread of
messages changes over time
- encourage users to have one main point per email message, or
adequately title messages to give an indication of the range of topics
covered. Again, information searching and reuse becomes difficult if
email titles are inadequate
- send around a summary of inadequate file titles that you have found
in the records system. Highlight the differences between the title and
the actual content of the message. Providing real examples of the
problem that are relevant to their business needs can help people
understand how this problem relates to their daily information
requirements.
It can be useful to establish clear rules for the content of email
messages too. Such rules can encourage staff to send clear and specific
messages and thereby eliminate the need for multiple follow-up
messages. This can save your organisation time and money. A survey by
the Institute of Chartered Accountants showed that 65% of email
messages fail to provide the recipient with enough information to act
on. Reintroduce traditional business rules for communications – make
sure all messages are properly titled, contain a defined action and a
timeframe. [21]
|
| We need to ensure that deleted messages are actually deleted |
Even though it may have been deleted, most information is regarded
as discoverable unless it is completely erased from computer and backup
systems.
When it is appropriate to do so, email messages that are no longer
required for business purposes should be destroyed. To minimise the
costs associated with searching though vast stores of data (for either
internal or legal purposes) and the inadvertent discovery of messages
long thought deleted, organisations need to establish:
- complete and thorough means for destroying digital records,
including email messages
- documented procedures and retention requirements for back-up tapes
and servers (in all locations), to ensure that email caches are not
retained indefinitely. Further guidance on the management of backups is
contained in the section on recordkeeping systems.
In relation to legal discovery orders, US courts have frequently
required complex and costly discovery orders and have required that the
plaintiffs should not have to pay these discovery costs, because the
defendants should have foreseen the need to appropriately manage their
email records when designing and implementing their email systems. One
agency, for example, had to bear the costs of reviewing ten years worth
of backup tapes, in response to a discovery order, at a cost of over $3
million. An email management strategy combined with an effective backup
management procedure could have significantly minimised these costs and
the required scale of the search.[22]
For more information, see State Records' Recordkeeping in Brief
51 - Destroying
digital records: when pressing delete is not
enough.
|
For more information on the management of email, see State Records’
Recordkeeping in Brief 49 - FAQs – emails and
recordkeeping.
Footnotes
[14] State Records Authority of NSW, 2005 Information survey on
digital recordkeeping, viewed June 2008,
<http://www.records.nsw.gov.au/recordkeeping/docs/information%20survey%20report%20final.pdf.pdf>.
[15] Calculation performed using the assessment tool at <
http://www.steverrobbins.com/email-overload/company-email-overload-assessment.htm#explanation>.
[16] State Records Authority of NSW, Report on the 2005 Information
survey on digital recordkeeping. op.cit.
[17] loc.cit.
[18] Research by Microsoft, quoted in Institute of Chartered
Accountants press release, Lack of email management costing
business, viewed December 2008, <http://www.charteredaccountants.com.au/A121361856>.
[19] Many of the recommendations in this section are based on advice
provided by Robert Green in his CAD Manager Column, particularly
CAD standards, Part 5: Enforcement (8 August 2007),
viewed September 2008, <http://management.cadalyst.com>.
[20] Research New Zealand, Report on the government recordkeeping
survey 2007, viewed December 2008, <
http://continuum.archives.govt.nz/files/file/Survey/2007%20Government%20Recordkeeping%20Survey%20Report.pdf>.
[21] Institute of Chartered Accountants, Press release: Lack
of email management costing business, 22 April 2008, viewed June
2008, <http://www.charteredaccountants.com.au/A121361856>.
[22] Managing electronic records seminar, the University of Texas at
Austin Graduate School of Library and Information Science, Technical
Summer Camp, 1997, Managing email as records: fundamental legal
issues, viewed June 2008, <
http://www.ischool.utexas.edu/~scisco/lis389c.5/email/legal.html>.
Other topics
1 Make digital
recordkeeping achievable for your organisation
2 Keep your
digital records in recordkeeping systems
3 Use
recordkeeping metadata for digital recordkeeping
4 Effectively manage
the migration of your digital records
5. Target specific formats that are causing you problems
Back to Managing
digital records overview
|
-
22 March: Forster Family History Advisory Group
Forster Library, Breese Parade Forster ,
Mar 22, 2010
-
27 March: Photographic resources of State Records
Central Coast Family History Society. Lions Hall, Russell Drysdale St, East Gosford,
Mar 27, 2010
-
29 March: Overview of the resources of State Records
Singleton Public Library, 8-10 Queen Street, Singleton,
Mar 29, 2010
|